Evaluating The Effectiveness Of Subliminal Mp3 : Subliminal MP3

Article by Greg Frost

There is a significant number of reports claiming that audio subliminal messages (e.g. subliminal mp3) are effective while some frowns at its deception. Some show proof through client reported results. The scientific community views these client reported result as just anecdotal.

The Greenwald, Pratkanis and Eskenazi experiment that determined the result of labels on expectation factor may be replicated using subliminal programs or any other self-help audio format. They acquired audio tapes, where subliminal mp3 can be substituted, from five companies. Just like the experiment, the labels of these self-esteem subliminal mp3 maybe exchanged with memory improvement subliminal mp3. The mislabelled subliminal mp3 can be given to the test subjects within the experiment’s group.

The original study was done as a double-blind experiment. The participants were required to make a report on the outcome at the end of the experiment. The reports indicated positive feedback of the tape, in the direction of the label. For example, should the tape be labelled “Memory Improvement,” the participants report an improvement in memory. Though, independent studies of memory improvement showed no actual difference.

Studies have time and again demonstrated effects recognized as placebo. Excellent research designs foresee placebo and experimental bias effects, and control for them. The double-blind technique of experiments is excellent in controlling influence of such factors. The double-blind test operates with having two or more researchers and at least three subject groups. It would be easy to expect that the result on the subliminal mp3 would be just like the experiment on the tape.

There is a test group and the people in this group receive the test property. On the other hand the control group consist of people who do not receive anything. There is also a placebo group; the people in this group receive a subliminal mp3. Where the subliminal audio is concerned, this often contains no subliminal content. Though, the researcher would have the subliminal mp3 contain some harmless message.

Another common form of study often used with these test subjects is that of a proper clinical design. There are a number of types of clinical designs, but the most consistent clinical research is obtained from instrument testing. A management modality is studied by conducting a test using some standard recognized scale before and after the experiment. This is both dependable and valid in the field of measurement. This type of scientific work is not merely a subjective procedure. Simply stated, the researching party is autonomously evaluating the results using some quantifiable scale and not depending on reports. Subjects that claimed improvements in memory or esteem, however, assessment of these reported achievements via instrument proved false.

The point, simply put, is this: Reports that do not use valid research designs are simply that, reports. They do not prove anything and indicate nothing. Without a doubt, controlled double-blind experiments for the subliminal programs are still considered by a number of scientists as merely suggestive.

When an individual says that they have the facts on a particular subject and quotes scientific fact, it is reasonable to expect that they follow the rules of science. Subliminal mp3s can be subjected to double-blind and clinical pre and post evaluation studies. But with so many people giving testimony to the effectiveness of subliminal mp3s, one wouldn’t be wrong in thinking that there might be some hope yet in subliminal mp3s.